A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 1, 2019, at around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) found the Defendant’s denial of the said apartment in D apartment E in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si; (b) and caused C and C to move to his/her wife; and (c) under such circumstances, G, who is a police official belonging to the Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do; and (d) Ha was dispatched to the said place upon receipt of a report by 112, and Ha was dispatched to the said place.

In such a situation, the Defendant, upon receiving a report 112 and receiving a request from the above police officers for continuous removal from C’s house without complying with the request, expressed that the above police officers “I am unable to continue to leave the C’s house,” and carried out a bath to the said police officers “I am unable to get their [I am unable to do so, I am unable to do so, I am kn’s hand, and kn’s body by hand.

Since then, the defendant continued to leave police officers

Without responding to the Gu, an assault was committed in a way of booming his body and pushing ahead with G and patrolman's H, without responding to the Gu.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of duties concerning 112 reporting affairs and prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of crimes.

2. At around 02:30 on November 1, 2019, the Defendant damaged public goods, the Defendant was arrested at the Criminal Team office of the Seosan Police Station in 159, Yansan-si, Chungcheongnamsan-si, Chungcheongnamsan-si, Yansan-si, as a flagrant offender committing an offense of obstruction of performance of official duties, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), and, during being arrested as a flagrant offender in the same manner as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), he was waiting to enter the detention room, and was seated in the suspect. The Defendant destroyed the c3,000 won of the market value (50 cm x 34 cm) at the time of use at the said Criminal Team office by head.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the articles used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting an offense;