1. The Defendant: KRW 17,728,710 to Plaintiff A; KRW 83,293,200 to Plaintiff B; KRW 23,302,80 to Plaintiff C; and KRW 67,151 to Plaintiff D.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) project title - Project name: Hanam-si Urban Development Project (G) - Public Notice: H on December 31, 2012, Gyeonggi-do Public Notice - i on January 9, 2015 - Project operator: Defendant

B. The ruling of expropriation made on July 27, 2015 by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal - The date of expropriation: The date of expropriation: Each land indicated in the column for “subject to expropriation” in the attached Table owned by the Plaintiffs located in the instant project zone (hereinafter “each land of this case”) - Compensation: The term “the result of the appraisal of expropriation” in the attached Table attached hereto.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation for a corporation and two appraisal corporations;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on May 26, 2016 - Compensation: The phrase “the result of appraisal of the said ruling” in the attached Table is indicated.

- An appraisal corporation: one appraisal corporation and a uniform appraisal corporation;

D. The result of the expertJ’s appraisal (hereinafter “the expertJ”) - The result of the expertJ’s appraisal (hereinafter “the court appraiser” and “the result of the court appraisal”) - The results of the court appraisal are as indicated in the “the result of the court appraisal” in the attached Table.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including each number if there is a satisfy number), the result of the appraisal by the appraiserJ, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The result of the plaintiffs' appraisal of the objection is unfair by excessively lowering the value of each land of this case. Thus, the defendant should pay the difference between the reasonable compensation according to the court appraisal result and the compensation according to the appraisal result of this appraisal to the plaintiffs.

3. The judgment of this Court

A. The following facts are acknowledged if the purport of the entire argument is added to each evidence mentioned above of the facts admitted:

1 Each of the instant lands is located in Kdong in the south-si, and the area of L districts, M districts, and NAs and Os are located in the south-dong, and nearby factories, farmland, and forests are mixed.

Each land of this case shall be the same.