beta
Text
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of setting fire against general goods is acquitted. The summary of the judgment of innocence against the Defendant.
Reasons
The acquittal portion
1. The summary of the facts charged was: (a) on June 25, 2015, at around 02:30, the Defendant: (b) on the front day of the “D main store” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (c) extracted a ice connected to the fuel tank of the victim E-owned by the victim E; and (d) took a theft of the gasoline flowing from the said ice by storing it into the citi ACE engine fuel box; and (e) laid the citi ACE engine and the gasoline flowing from the said ice on the lower part of the victim E-owned; and (e) laid the citter in order to cut the said twit to a proper size, which would have not come to the said tate; and (e) moved it to the FitiCE engine and the H bicycle length equivalent to the total market value of the victim E-owned.
Accordingly, the defendant, by preventing the general goods owned by the victim, caused public danger.
2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the fact that the Defendant, around June 25, 2015, attempted to steal gasoline on the part of the victim around 02:30 on June 25, 2015, had a fire on the part of the victim, and the fact that the fire on the part of the victim was destroyed on the part of the victim on the part of the victim.
However, in light of the following circumstances that can be seen by evidence, including the victim’s statement, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the defendant attached to the above pest as the victim’s intention to extinguish the lebane owned by the prosecutor, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.
A. G was difficult to contain gasoline due to the Defendant’s lack of access to the bar in the process of stealing gasoline with the Defendant from the investigative agency to the court, as the Defendant was too heavy, while the Defendant stolen gasoline with the Defendant. As such, the Defendant put the bar to the bar in order to cut the bar.