1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,109,233,931 as well as 5% per annum from January 4, 2011 to January 26, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

A. In the event that it is difficult to observe the boiler. It is determined that explosiond by an increase of the internal pressure of not less than a safety valve is “explosive explosion” (Evidence B) that it would not lead to an accident if the valves at the normal operation of the boiler water tank or pressure string system were not locked (No. 19) (in the absence of the pressure-restricted valves, it is anticipated that the operation of boiler would have failed to take an excessive pressure inside the boiler even if the pressure-limit was stopped, and that there was no possibility that it would have led to an explosion, and that there would have been no possibility that there was no possibility that the said boiler would have been operated in the normal state of water supply in the absence of an automatic water tank (No. 20 evidence). 【Request for investigative cooperation’) It would be difficult to determine that the water level and non-explicated water supply pumps were operated due to an accident, such as a water level change in the air level and non-explication of the water tank 2).