logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.07.19 2018고정13
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 7, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the business, within the tax accounting corporation D office of 508 of the building in the area of 13:00 Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and 4 insurance premiums excessive due to the error of tax management requested by the Defendant.

The author argued that the four major insurance premiums are to be borne by the tax accountant office, and that the victim's tax accounting firm D's business was obstructed by force by avoiding disturbances, such as putting him/her in mind and her desire for about two hours, and putting his/her indoor telephone.

2. The Defendant, who uses violence or property damage at the same time and place as set forth in the above paragraph 1, and used a phone call at the victim E (33) who is an employee of the tax accounting corporation D to ask the victim whether or not the Defendant can revoke the Defendant’s comprehensive income tax return by telephone at this tax office, and used the victim’s cell phone with the victim’s left arms as hacks, and used the victim’s hacks with the victim’s left arm’s length, and used the victim’s hacks to tear down at the market price where the victim was suffering.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. The legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of letters sent to and received from A;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, within the tax accounting corporation’s D office located in 508 of the building in the area of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do on July 7, 2017, called the victim E (33 tax) who is an employee of the tax accounting corporation, could cancel the Defendant’s comprehensive income tax return by asking the victim’s cell phone at the tax office. The Defendant wanted to put the victim’s cell phone with the victim’s cell phone with the face-to-to-face of the victim’s left arms, and the market price in which the victim was suffering.

arrow