The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflects on all of the crimes of this case is advantageous.

However, each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant while driving a vehicle without a driver's license without leaving the scene without taking necessary measures to destroy and damage damaged vehicles, and then making the defendant make a false statement to the F, on behalf of the defendant, at the investigative agency, and without being aware of the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, even though he was under the suspension of execution due to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving). In full view of all the circumstances, including balance of general criminal punishment in the same similar case, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed appropriate and it is too unreasonable to determine that the sentence of the defendant is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.