(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.10.25 2019고단973

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.10.25 2019고단973

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the above fine is not paid, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 5, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Jeonju District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On July 25, 2019, at around 07:29, the Defendant, who was punished for a drunk driving, driven a horse on the horse in the state of alcohol 0.054% of blood alcohol concentration at approximately 800 meters from the front of the B apartment in the Hasan City to the front of D located in the same city C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Notification of the result of the drinking driving control;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (Attachment to a summary order of the same kind of power), and application of one copy of the summary order under Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 148-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act of the choice of a sentence, the selection of a fine (which is recognized as being punished for driving under the influence of alcohol, and again leads to driving under the influence of alcohol, but it is recognized as committing the crime, reflects the fact that it is punished twice as a fine, and the blood alcohol concentration in this case is not higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that in this case, after being punished for driving under the influence of alcohol in 2013, there is no criminal record of the same kind of crime. In particular, it is found that the defendant was released from the company when he was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or more, and was found to have been locked while driving under the influence of alcohol while driving under the influence of alcohol on the next day,

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

참조조문

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.11.29 2019고단1288

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2020.01.17 2019고단1382

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.11.15 2019고단1209

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.07.26 2019고단511

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.03.22 2018고단1387