logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.07.07 2014가단44904
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 343,001,506 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 20 million to Plaintiff B; and (c) from December 24, 2013 to July 2016, respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The basis of liability: (a) around 07:10 on December 24, 2013, C neglected the duty to take a front floor in the Hyundai Heavy Industries Headquarters of the Hyundai Heavy Industries Headquarters in Ulsan-dong defense Dong-dong, and neglected to take two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the marine industry headquarters in front of the defense Dong-dong, and thus neglecting the duty to take a front floor in the front floor of the marine business headquarters at the time when he did not discover the plaintiff A, who was the left-hand side in front of the above chartered bus operation direction at the time when he did not find the above front floor of the above chartered bus operation direction, and caused the above plaintiff A's injury, such as the ground for the left-hand head part of the above chartered bus operation (hereinafter referred to as "the accident in this case"); (b) The plaintiff B is a dependent of the plaintiff A; (c) the defendant is liable for the dispute between the parties to a mutual aid agreement on the above chartered bus, or for the damage of the plaintiffs as the above number of the buses in this case.

B. (1) However, according to the evidence mentioned above, the defendant's liability is limited to 80% by taking into account the above circumstances in determining the amount of damages to be compensated by the defendant, since it is deemed that the plaintiff A did not have a vehicle driving on the front and rear left of the crosswalk, and it can be found that the plaintiff neglected it, even though he did not have a vehicle driving on the front and rear left of the crosswalk, and that the plaintiff neglected it, and such circumstance also contributed to the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the accident in this case.

(2) The Defendant: (a) the instant accident occurred not in the public road but in the company’s arbitrarily built crosswalks on the company’s own road; and (b) the delivery side prior to the direction of the instant chartered bus has a 170 cm hushesium, and the point at which the instant accident occurred.

arrow