A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a victim E (ma, 56 years old) living in the building immediately adjacent to the building D, which is located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2nd floor, and a person who has a dispute over land boundary for 20 years.

1. Around 20:00 on June 25, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively weapon, etc.) reported that the victim is walking rapidly on the second floor of the office of the Defendant C at Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Defendant’s second floor, and that the victim expressed the victim’s desire to “abscoping to walk promptly on the second floor of the victim’s residence,” and used the victim as follows: (a) the opper lid, an empty beer, and approximately 10 empty beer soldiers, and an empty beer’s disease to the part of the victim’s bridge; and (b) the part of the strike was flickly flicked to the victim’s growth and flive to the part of the victim’s bridge.

2. The Defendant destroyed and damaged property at the time, place, as mentioned in the above paragraph (1) above, one of the victim’s possession market value, which was located on the rooftop of the victim’s residence, was damaged by the victim’s lids, beer, beer, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each field photograph, the body photograph of the victim;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc., Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., that the criminal defendant generally reflects his/her wrongness, circumstances leading to this case, age of the criminal defendant, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Considering the reasons for discretionary mitigation and the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment heavier than imprisonment without prison labor);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason of not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;