A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

On December 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing business operations at the Seoul Eastern District Court on December 22, 2016 and completed the execution of the sentence in the said prison on June 18, 2017.

On September 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 11:50 on September 23, 2017, at the entrance of “E”, the bicycle race managed by the victim D (32 taxes) of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, the Defendant: (b) obstructed customers entering the bicycle race without any particular reason; (c) cut off the bit of bitbit of a bitch, bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of bit of a bit of a

Along to approximately 30 minutes of the disturbance, such as taking a bath with a large amount of hump, the victim interfered with affairs concerning the operation of the bicycle racing by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Criminal video CDs and compilation photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (the result of the case search);

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [the scope of recommended punishment] Article 35 of the Criminal Act where the degree of power, deceptive scheme, or the degree of interference with business is insignificant in the mitigated area (one month to eight months) (a person subject to special mitigation) (a person subject to special mitigation)] / The fact that the defendant has the records of having been punished several times for the same kind of crime, the fact that the defendant constitutes a repeated crime, the fact that the degree of interference with business is minor, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as the same as the order.