The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The lower court, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, found all of the facts charged of this case guilty.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “documents verifying that a person is a legal guardian,” as prescribed by Article 24(1) of the former Mental Health Act (wholly amended by Act No. 14224, May 29, 2016), “discharge order” as prescribed by Article 24(4), “check order” as prescribed by Article 40, “check” as prescribed by Article 40, “justifiable act” as a justifiable act, and deception in fraud.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.