logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.12.18 2019가단5068424
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 993,929,530 as well as 5% per annum from June 20, 2017 to December 18, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Defendant is Cunstasi (hereinafter “Defendant”)

D) around 08:00 on June 20, 2017, the front road of E was driven by the Defendant on the 3rd-way distance from the boundary of the New-dong Resident Center, at the time of interest.

The plaintiff was placed on the right side of the running direction of the defendant vehicle with a crosswalk without signal, etc.

D without properly verifying pedestrians, the driver was able to walk the Plaintiff with the front part of the vehicle, and the driver was shocked by the driver of the vehicle. After driving the vehicle, the plaintiff who was able to take the speed pedal, followed by the driver of the vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as sugars, cages, and cages, in two accidents. [Grounds for recognition] of absence of dispute, Gap’s 1 through 3, 8, and Eul’s 4, as well as the descriptions and images (including the case of serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) of Eul’s 1 through 3, and 8.

- The purport of the whole pleadings

B. The Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as a mutual aid business operator of the vehicle, since the Plaintiff sustained an injury due to the operation of the Defendant vehicle to recognize liability.

The defendant asserts that the plaintiff was negligent in contributing to the occurrence of the accident because he did not properly examine the movement of the vehicle.

However, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Plaintiff was standing the crosswalk on the opposite side of the road that the Defendant’s vehicle used to stand up to 1/3; (b) the Defendant’s vehicle used to drive the crosswalk on the crosswalk on which the U-turn is not allowed; and (c) the Plaintiff’s emotional shocked the Plaintiff; and (d) the Plaintiff was shocked on the road, and was shocked by the course, the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as

The defendant's argument on limitation of liability is without merit.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, the annexed sheet of liability for damages shall be as follows.

The period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, and shall be calculated on a monthly basis.

arrow