Imprisonment with prison labor for each crime provided for in paragraph (1) of the judgment of the defendant, and for each crime provided for in paragraphs (2), (3) and (4) of the judgment of the court.

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for habitual fraud, etc. at the Jeonju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on November 8, 2008. On July 9, 2009, the execution of the sentence was terminated on September 6, 2009 by being sentenced to eight months for habitual fraud at the Changwon District Court. On September 14, 2012, the Daejeon District Court was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for public interest in the Daejeon District Court’s public interest branch on September 14, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 13, 2014; on December 9, 2014, the execution of the sentence was terminated; and on April 3, 2015, the judgment became final and conclusive on April 16, 2015 by imprisonment with prison labor from the Southern District Court’s assistance branch on April 28, 2015.

1. Crimes against victims E;

A. On March 30, 201, at around 15:10 on March 30, 201, the defrauded E (n.e., 59 years old) located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Defendant would allow the Defendant to borrow KRW 100 million from Changwon-si, if he knows that the Defendant was able to take advantage of his piracy as a consequence of his piracy, and that the Defendant would be able to borrow a large amount of money from his son if he had a good interest of KRW 15 million.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the facts are that the defendant did not know that he did not have to get a loan of KRW 100 million, and even if he received a prior interest from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to arrange a loan of KRW 100 million.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the delivery of KRW 15 million from the victim under the same day as the interest on the same day.

B. The Defendant, at the above date, at the above place, has a lux in order to lend the Defendant KRW 15 million to a bank, using the lux in which the victim used a lux in order to get the Defendant to use the lux in order to make the lux in a lux, one color room equivalent to KRW 200,000 in the market value of the victim’s possession, and one lux in which the market value is equivalent to KRW 300,000 in lu