Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person qualified as a national cost researcher, who is a director of B, who is a cost accounting agency, and is in office as a vice-chairperson of C, an incorporated association, which is a consultative body of the cost accounting agency, the examination of cost accounting agency, the registration, and the national cost analysis agent qualification examination.

In the case of a qualifying examination for national cost analysis personnel, it is necessary to calculate the estimated price at the time of the manufacture and purchase of various construction works or goods ordered by the State, local governments, public enterprises, private enterprises, etc., the certificate of qualification introduced by the holder of a specialized in cost calculation field as a private qualification from 201 to 201, which was registered and implemented as a private qualification from December 31, 201, the national certification was acquired from the Ministry of Strategy and Finance on December 31, 2013 and the first test was implemented on June 28, 2014.

The defendant was commissioned as the education examination chairperson and the grading and examination chairperson of the qualifying examination for the first national cost analysis worker, and participated in the grading of the subjective text.

On July 2, 2014, the Defendant gave marks at the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D building and the meeting room of an incorporated association in the fourth floor, the Defendant was aware that the result of the subjective marking of the “production cost calculation practical” subject is about 0 points in the first school, among the answer sheets submitted by the Defendant’s wife E, and that the result of the subjective marking of the “production cost calculation practical” subject is about 0 points in the first school, and that it is likely that the Defendant would not be subject to the pass of the examination after receiving the points corresponding to the fruit. As such, the Defendant passed the examination by correcting the subjective answer sheet of the answer sheet submitted after the completion of the examination so that he may pass the examination so that he can pass the examination and raise the points at the level of turning the pass of the examination.

The defendant has not yet been given a mark, and he has secured E in the answer sheet of the "Work for Construction and Other Cost Calculation" subject, and he has received the subjective answer sheet No. 30 among them.