The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged of this case, around July 8, 2000, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by the road management authority by loading and operating the freight exceeding the restricted width of the freight vehicles owned by the Defendant in relation to the Defendant’s business, at the examination room for the regulation of the vehicle traffic-restricted vehicles located in the 7 line located in the Jinjin National Highway, if the Defendant was to deliver the cargo to North-gu, North-si.

2. The public prosecutor instituted a public prosecution on the facts charged of this case by applying the provision of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) that "if an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 with respect to the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be fined under the corresponding provision."

However, on October 28, 2010, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality as to the above provision of the law (the Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merger) on October 28, 2010). Accordingly, the above provision of the law was retroactively invalidated in accordance with the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.