logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.11.22 2017고단295
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for crimes No. 1, 3, and 4 of the judgment of the defendant B, one year and one year, and the judgment No. 2.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Ⅰ. Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on February 13, 2014, and on February 21, 2014, the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 21, 2014.

Defendant

B On March 14, 2006, the Seoul High Court sentenced two years to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and completed the execution of the sentence on June 29, 2007.

Defendant

B was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on February 21, 2012, and the said judgment was finalized on October 11, 2012. On March 29, 2013, the same court was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment and a fine of five million won for a crime of fraud in the same court on March 29, 2013. On September 5, 2013, the same court was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for a crime of fraud in the same court on September 5, 2013. On December 14, 2016, the Incheon District Court was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment and a fine of five million won for a crime of fraud, etc.

[2] Around August 2007, Defendant B sold the said “Et” at the request of Defendant G (Gu H, hereinafter “G”) and Defendant A, who operated the said “I Et” under the said corporation at Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around August 2007, and Defendant B, around October 2007, established the “K Et” to theJ in the previous North-to-Eup Eup/Myeon, using Defendant A and the said G corporation, and Defendant A was in charge of the said G and K Et’s representative director, and was in charge of the operation of the said K Et’s representative and management, and Defendant B was in fact in charge of the business of operating K Et’s contract, receipt and disbursement of funds, etc.

However, even if the sale of the goods by opening K Mart and making profits, there was a situation that the amount of the bill or check issued in the name of the Defendant A and the maturity of which comes after the issuance in the name of the Defendant. Defendant B and Defendant A without any other property at the time.

arrow