The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the charge is an attorney-at-law.

E Farming Association Corporation (Representative F) purchased three sites for urban support facilities located in GH from GH Corporation in the G Housing Site Development Zone located in GH Corporation and selected H(Representative I) as an implementing agency when promoting the new construction of apartment-type factories by purchasing 29,69.17 square meters.

On the other hand, the defendant was a legal representative of the administrative litigation case filed against LH Corporation by the members of the above association.

However, in order to implement the above project, approximately KRW 7 billion was required first, including the land sales contract amount of KRW 6.2 billion and other expenses to be paid to LH Corporation.

The defendant, who is well aware of this situation, is able to raise 7 billion won to the above I as a bond, and it is necessary to pay 500 million won to the previous owner of the loan in order to raise funds.

The victim J decided to invest the above I in the company with respect to the above business through K, and to provide 500 million won to the defendant.

On January 10, 2014, the Defendant stated to the effect that, at the office of the above company located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, the Defendant would offer the said I and the victims a financing of KRW 7 billion to him/her through the former share of all the State, and thereby, he/she would have to obtain a financing of KRW 5 billion. However, if he/she intends to obtain a financing in the bond market, it is necessary to have the former share of KRW 500 million confirmed the borrower's repayment ability. (b) If he/she is assigned to the former share of KRW 500 million, he/she shall confirm the internal share of KRW 50 billion to the former share of KRW 7 billion, and if he/she will return KRW 500 million to the victim until January 24, 2014.

However, the facts did not know that the Defendant was not directly aware of the entire owner that it is possible to lend funds, and M that the Defendant said the victim, etc. was not capable of directly lending funds or raising funds through the former owner, and otherwise 7 billion won.