logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.09.08 2017나50766
양수금
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff succeeding intervenor KRW 4,442,249 and 3,894 among them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant applied for membership of a credit card company (hereinafter “mull Card”) and used it with a credit card and delayed payment. The principal of the card price in arrears at the time was KRW 3,894,838.

(hereinafter “instant claim”). (b)

On July 19, 2006, the Bar Card filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for the claim for payment of the instant claim under the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2006Da1764311, and the Defendant was finally determined as of October 11, 2006 on the ground that the Defendant did not object to the decision on performance recommendation made by the said court on September 26, 2006, even if it was served on September 26, 2006.

C. Thereafter, on September 28, 2010, the registration card transferred the instant claim to the Solomon Savings Bank (hereinafter “ Solomon Savings Bank”), to the Solomon Savings Bank on December 1, 201, to the solomon Savings Company (hereinafter “Nlomon Savings Bank”), to the NAsco LLC, and to the NAsco LLC on May 21, 2013, to the NAsco Baison Asset Management Loan, to the Defendant on May 21, 2013, to the White Asset Management Loan, to the Plaintiff on October 30, 2015, and to the Plaintiff to whom the authority of the former transferor to notify the assignment of the claim was delegated by the content-certified mail, and this notification was served on the Defendant on December 18, 2015.

On January 11, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for the instant claim for the transfer money, and the judgment of the first instance court citing the Plaintiff’s claim was rendered on December 21, 2016.

E. On December 27, 2016, the Plaintiff transferred the instant claim to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor, who was delegated with the authority to notify the assignment of claims by the Plaintiff, notified the Defendant of the assignment of claims by the content-certified mail as of January 9, 2017 and June 23, 2017.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 12, Eul evidence 4 (including the paper number), all pleadings.

arrow