1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A KRW 81,00,000, and KRW 19,000,000 to the plaintiff D and each of them shall be repaid from January 1, 2007.

1. The plaintiff's judgment as to the plaintiff's claim can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of all pleadings as to each of the statements in the annexed sheet Nos. 1 and 5 (including additional numbers) as to the plaintiff's claim cause of the claim of this case. Thus, the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A the amount of 81,00,000,000, and the amount of 19,000,000,000, and interest on delay calculated at the rate of 24% per annum from January 1, 2007, which is the initial date of the agreement, to the date of full payment. The plaintiff B shall pay to the plaintiff 1 the amount of 81,00,000,000, and the amount of 19,000,000,000, and the amount of 15,000,000 per annum from January 1, 208 to December 19, 2016.

2. On the judgment of the defendant's assertion, the defendant asserts that the defendant, for about three years from December 12, 1989 to January 1, 1993, he received KRW 100 million from the plaintiff A from the payment of wages that he had been employed as an employee in the defendant's corporate F Co., Ltd., a small father of the defendant, and did not receive, but he received from the plaintiff A during the period from March 5, 200 to November 30, 2006, the plaintiff B, who was the plaintiff A's infant, asserted that the above money was the loan, and made two loans (the evidence Nos. 1 and 4) by the defendant, who was unable to check the defendant's strong pressure, and therefore, he did not have a duty to repay, and even if the above money was given, the ten-year extinctive prescription expires.

Therefore, the defendant did not submit any evidence to acknowledge that the above money received by the defendant is not a loan, but a wage, and the plaintiff B's strong pressure (Evidence A 1 and 4) was written, and the defendant agreed to pay the money and made a loan certificate on November 30, 2006.