The defendant's KRW 10,900,000 to the plaintiff and its related 5% per annum from May 9, 2020 to February 5, 2021.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or are acknowledged as being based on Gap evidence of Nos. 1 to 3, 7, 8, 22 and 22, Gap evidence of No. 24 to 31, 35 to 37, and 40, each film of evidence of Nos. 24 to 37, and 40 as a whole.

A. From February 1, 2016, the Plaintiff leased Seongbuk-gu Seoul apartment C, and D (hereinafter “instant reading room”) and operated the E reading room at that place.

The defendant is an organization consisting of representatives elected by occupants for the management of the above B apartment house, which is a multi-family housing (hereinafter referred to as the "multi-family housing of this case").

B. The reading room of this case consists of 15 reading rooms (number of seats 99), Internet rooms, resting rooms, offices, etc., and is located under the ground of the apartment F consent of this case.

In the underground space between the apartment F-dong and the reading room of the instant case, various pipes, such as water supply and drainage pipes, boiler pipes, and waste water pipes, managed by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant pipes”).

(c)

From February 15, 2016 to March 2020, water leakage from the pipelines of this case caused flood damage that flows out from the ceiling of the reading room of this case, such as the reading room Nos. 2, 3, 9, 13, 14 reading room, and the exit corridor of the reading room No. 9 reading room, the Internet room, the resting room, and the office (hereinafter “water leakage accident of this case”).

Meanwhile, through the underground space of the apartment of this case, the height of the apartment of this case, which entered the reading place in the reading room of this case, fell into the reading room of this case on February 25, 2016, and the Plaintiff’s employees G suffered an injury to the Plaintiff’s losses in order to catch the above height (hereinafter “accident”). The assertion and determination on February 2, 201

A. The plaintiff in the part of the claim for indemnity was caused by the defect in the installation or preservation of the underground space of the apartment of this case, which is a structure, and the plaintiff was treated as G.