logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원곡성군법원 2019.10.11 2019가단19
청구이의의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s payment order for the purchase price for goods No. 2016Hu150 against the Plaintiff of the Gwangju District Court of Daejeon District Court.

Reasons

1. The purport that compulsory execution based on the above payment order should not be allowed, on the ground that the Defendant’s claim for goods payment against the Plaintiff, which is the cause of the claim for the payment order indicated in Paragraph (1) of the specification of the claim, does not exist due to the lapse of the extinctive prescription period of three years due to the expiration of the extinctive prescription period of three years

2. Judgment made by deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow