logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.10 2015고단2670
절도
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years, and by imprisonment with prison labor for two years.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C From 2010 to 2010, the researchers working at (State) the part quality team of the main part of the business site of the J, and Defendant B, from around 2010 to around 2010 to the quality manager working at (State) K that supplies the victims with smartphone components, and Defendant A, who worked at (State) K, was an employee in charge of business operation from around 2012 to August 2014; Defendant C first became aware of the business relationship with Defendant B, A, etc., as the partner, and Defendant B, et al. became aware of each other.

On February 2, 2014, the Defendants sold smartphones, which are owned by the victim, with intent to distribute profits therefrom after selling them, and Defendant C conspiredd to take the role of shipping out of the damaged smartphones, such as the external analysis request of the smartphones which are inferior, the fact that the smartphones are shipped out to an external business entity in order to request analysis, or the fact that the smartphones, which are inferior, need not be returned again, and that the smartphones are removed from the scene of the damaged smartphones, such as the fixed amount of smartphones or the crops, which are to be disposed of after completing experiments, and Defendant A, B, etc. made it impossible to erase the source of the smartphones, the QR code, and the boiler, etc. attached to the smartphones carried out by Defendant C, and made it impossible to trace the source thereof, and then sold them to the mobile phone purchaser, respectively.

Defendant

C On February 6, 2014, at the victim's astronomical site located in Seo-gu L in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-si L, the victim took 40 smartphone size out under the pretext of external analysis, and the defendant A, B, etc. took them out to the defendant A. The defendant A, B, etc., around February 6, 2014, received 40,000,000 won of the smartphone size from the defendant C in cash, and sold 5,00,000 won of the smartphone size from the defendant C at the "N" office, which is a mobile phone dealer, around 302. The defendants around that time.

arrow