Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:30 on May 1, 2014, the Defendant, at the Seo-gu Daejeon, proposed to transfer the substitute driving fee to the victim E (57 years of age) who is a substitute driving engineer in front of the Seo-gu Daejeon, but on the ground that the victim refused to pay the above substitute driving fee instead of the daily driving that he had been in operation with the Defendant, and caused the victim to do so. B, on the ground that “I want to do so, I would like to do so. I would like to do so. I would like to do so. I would like to do so.” The Defendant assaulted the victim E (57 years of age), who was a substitute driving engineer in front of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, on three occasions, with her hand, and tried to kill the bomb, and continuously spawn it

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act acknowledged the fact that he saw the victim’s breath by one hand. However, the Defendant asserts that he did not look at the victim’s breath or cream. As such, the victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to this court that he suffered the same damage as the facts charged. In full view of the following circumstances, there is no lack to find the Defendant guilty of the facts charged.

① Examining the victim’s photograph taken at the time of the instant case, it is possible to find out that the upper part of the victim’s photograph was located near the shoulder, which constitutes the upper part of the lower part.

On the other hand, in the case where the head of bridges with a single hand as alleged by the defendant, the breath does not have power on the side because of a device that gives and gains a larlar, and it is difficult on both sides of the lower part. Therefore, unlike the upper part on the upper part of the above photograph, the upper part on the upper part of the upper part of the subject should be located differently from the upper part of the above photograph.

Therefore, it is reasonable to see that the upper part of the victim's bloom was not generated by the flating flat, but directly by the flating.

(2) A victim;