(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.02.15 2018가단125508

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.02.15 2018가단125508

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The owners of a group of lands located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul and D shall establish a reconstruction association around November 1, 1990 to form a reconstruction promotion committee (which was called the reconstruction promotion committee) in order to implement a reconstruction project on their own land. They appointed E as the head of the reconstruction promotion headquarters and appointed E to undertake a reconstruction project.

In light of the location of land for convenience, the above owners decided to proceed with a reconstruction project by dividing into the FF district, G district and D district. On April 15, 199, the establishment of a reconstruction association was approved by the competent authority on April 15, 199, and the Plaintiff was the head of the said association from October 22, 1994 to November 6, 201.

B. Around 193 and around 194, the D Reconstruction Housing Association (hereinafter “D”) and the F District Reconstruction Promotion Committee concluded a construction contract with H Co., Ltd. to construct an apartment in the said project district.

C. The defendant is the owner of the I site and the second floor house adjacent to the above C, and as a result of the above apartment construction work of the reconstruction promotion committee and H, which the plaintiff et al. became the owner, damaged by the collapse of the ground of the above house owned by the plaintiff and the removal of the wall. On December 19, 198, the head of the reconstruction promotion headquarters, E, F district, G district, J, which is the president of the non-party partnership, K, K, and the plaintiff, shall transfer the ownership of the above site and building owned by the defendant until December 20, 1998 so that the defendant can use the above site and building for the above reconstruction, and the two houses of 80 square meters in total on the register of real estate among the L apartment to be established due to the above reconstruction were purchased by the plaintiff and there is a difference in the above 80 square meters (hereinafter "the agreement of this case").

Accordingly, the defendant is not more than 'the above L Apartment M' from the non-party partnership.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.17 2017가단19423

-서울서부지방법원 2016.07.07 2015가단248901

-서울행정법원 2015.08.27 2015구합905

-서울동부지방법원 2015.09.11 2014가단54732

-서울북부지방법원 2020.10.15 2020가합20405