The defendant shall be innocent.

1. With respect to the defendant's work as to the charge, A's employee Gap's employee rejected the request of the management agency for the measurement of the load on the cargo vehicle B B 25 tons from the street in front of the inspection station in the YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

2. The former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993 and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) which is a legal provision applicable to the facts charged of this case, where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 84 subparagraphs 1 and 2 of the same Article with respect to the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article.

“The effect of the part” was the Constitutional Court Order 201Hun-Ga24 Decided November 29, 201, the 2012 Constitutional Court Order 201Hun-Ga18 Decided October 25, 201, and Article 47(3) of the Constitutional Court Act retroactively lost pursuant to Article 47(3) of the Constitutional Court Act.

In addition, where the penal law or the legal provision becomes retroactively null and void due to the decision of unconstitutionality, the defendant's case which was prosecuted by applying the relevant provision shall be deemed to be a crime.

Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.