beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-wing and freight vehicles.
On January 29, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 06:05, and proceeded bypassing the intersection of the three-lanes in front of the Yangsansan Hospital located in the Sonsan-Eup of water in Yangsan-si in Yangsan-si from the water basin to the four-lanes of the two-lanes from the water basin.
Since there is a tri-distance intersection where signal lights are installed in the front side, the driver has a duty of care to operate the direction direction, etc. to give notice of change of course, and to change the difference in the front and rear left, so that the driver has a duty of care to change the difference in the direction.
Nevertheless, due to the negligence of moving off the four lanes from four-lanes to two-lanes, and moving back to the left from the opposite line of the victim C (Nam, 40 years old) who was going to the left in accordance with the new subparagraph, the victim E (Seoul, 24 years old) who was going to the right from the opposite line of the defendant's vehicle to the right side of the victim C (the 40-year-old driver) who was going to the right side of the cargo of the defendant, and the victim suffered from the injury such as the need for treatment for about two weeks of the cargo of the defendant, the pel part, the pel part, and the tension and tension of the detailed part, and the injury of the victim E (the victim E (Nam, South, and 24 years old) who was taken on the top of the damaged vehicle for about two weeks.
2. The offense of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents shall not be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under the provisions of the main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.
After the prosecution of this case, on February 13, 2020, a written agreement was submitted that the victims do not want punishment of the defendant.
This constitutes a case where there is an expression of intent not to punish a person under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition as to the facts charged in this case.