logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.25 2016가단19067
면책확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 3, 2003, the Defendant: “Around January 30, 2003, the Plaintiff was driving the Plaintiff’s Daun-dong-gu Dunst Motor Vehicle at the Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon around 13:05, while driving the F-wing Vehicle, the Defendant proceeded in the same direction while driving the vehicle in the same direction; and the Plaintiff’s driver’s above vehicle could rapidly change the vehicle to the second line during the driving of the vehicle in the middle of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, but did not have to do so, obstructed the operation of the vehicle in front of the other party’s vehicle, etc.; at the same time, the Defendant stopped the Plaintiff at the above place, and the Plaintiff was faced with the Plaintiff’s flash, and the Defendant’s face was faced with the Plaintiff’s own 10 drinking house and claimed compensation for damages for about 28 days from the Plaintiff’s 200-gu, Daejeon District Court.”

B. On November 13, 2003, the court of first instance rendered a judgment citing part of the Defendant’s claim that “the Plaintiff shall pay to the Defendant the amount of KRW 2,326,691 and the amount calculated at the rate of 5% per annum from March 28, 2003 to November 13, 2003, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment. The Defendant’s remaining claims are dismissed.”

C. The defendant appealed against the above judgment, and the appellate court (Seoul District Court 2003Na12340) partially revoked the part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance on August 20, 2004, and ordered the plaintiff to pay 1,512,200 won as well as 5% per annum from March 28, 2003 to November 13, 2003, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment, and sentenced the decision dismissing the remainder of the defendant's appeal. The above judgment became final and conclusive on September 10, 204.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff.

arrow