1. A notary public between the Plaintiff and the Defendant shall be based on a promissory note No. 368, 2016.

1. On April 18, 2016, the Defendant, indicating the claim, issued promissory notes with face value of KRW 24 million, the issue date, the place of payment, and the place of payment on May 30, 2016, which indicated as the issuer, the Defendant, and the Plaintiff. On the same day, the Plaintiff and the Defendant received the authentic deed of promissory notes No. 368 of C law firm No. 368 of 2016. The Plaintiff filed the lawsuit of this case for the interruption of the extinctive prescription of the said promissory notes (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act).