logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.10.15 2015나51789
대여금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff Company is a company that completed the registration of incorporation on June 29, 201 for the purpose of advertising agency business, event agency business, etc., and the Plaintiff B is an internal director of the Plaintiff Company on the corporate register. The Defendant is a person who worked as the head of the Plaintiff Company from July 1, 2011 to December 10, 2013, which was at the time of incorporation of the Plaintiff Company.

B. The Plaintiff Company transferred to the Defendant KRW 30 million on August 3, 2011, and KRW 10 million on July 27, 2012, respectively.

C. Plaintiff B transferred to the Defendant KRW 10 million on July 27, 2012, and KRW 2 million on October 6, 2012, respectively.

Plaintiff

On September 1, 201, the Company: (a) provided the Defendant with the lease of a rocketing vehicle for commuting and business use; (b) concluded the lease contract under the name of the lessee without concluding the lease contract on the ground that the Plaintiff Company was a newly incorporated corporation; (c) but (d) concluded the contract with the lessee as the Defendant; (c) however, (d) KRW 5,430,00 and KRW 611,70 per month were borne by the Plaintiff Company.

At present, the above vehicles are continuously used by the defendant.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's entries in Gap's 1 through 6, 9 through 13, 16, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The plaintiff company's claim for loans of KRW 30 million against the plaintiff company (1) is claiming that the defendant loaned money to the company that the defendant attended to establish the plaintiff company and to take charge of its business. Thus, the plaintiff company transferred KRW 30 million to the defendant around August 3, 2011 by transferring the money to the defendant. The defendant received a proposal from the plaintiff company Eul, who works for the plaintiff company, that the defendant is liable for the debt of KRW 60 million to the plaintiff company, and it is possible to transfer the money to the defendant. Accordingly, D is required to bear the expenses for the debt of KRW 30 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

arrow