Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

except that the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On October 21, 2018, at around 22:43, the Defendant: (a) boarded the seat bus at the bus stop located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) tried to burns the bus with an article C and an unspecified number of passengers on board a bus with a stringer installed at the bus hold immediately before the bus stops at the bus stop at the bus stop located in Sung-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul; (c) on around 23:03 on the same day, the Defendant attempted to extinguish the bus with a stringer installed at the bus hold at the bus hold at the bus stop located in Sung-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul. However, the Defendant attempted to extinguish the bus with a stringer, which is an article of the bus, by putting the bus on a stringer installed at the bus hold.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to close a fireproof report (influencing a stud photo), a photo, etc. of a fluculate stud, a report on internal investigation (blucing a bus blucing box, a screen screen, and a Dblucing screen screen;

1. Article 174 of the Criminal Act and Articles 174 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of limited imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution - The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - Since the crime of this case was committed against attempted attempts, the sentencing guidelines are not applicable. The crime of this case is intended to extinguish by setting fire to buses on which many passengers are aboard, and the nature of the crime is not good in that there is a risk of causing a large amount of human life damage. On the other hand, the defendant is deeply against the crime of this case and there is no criminal conviction exceeding the fine. - The crime of this case is not significantly damaged