beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Name of the instant patent invention 1) invention: The name of the file file valves: The main contents of the safety valves installed in the pressure storage tank and maintained the pressure inside the tank below a certain pressure, which work first at the time when the pressure inside the tank increases above a certain scope. 2) Date of application / Date of registration / Registration / Registration number / August 16, 2006 (No. 10-617425, 3): Plaintiff 4) main contents: attached Table 1:
(hereinafter, the claim 1 of the patented invention of this case is referred to as the "claim 1 of this case", and the remainder of the claims is also referred to as the same method).
1) Prior Invention 1) The prior invention 1 (No. 5) published on June 3, 1992, is an invention on the "scriptive structure of valves" published on the Japanese Patent Gazette No. 3122123, which is published on June 3, 1992, and its main contents are as shown in attached Form 2(1). 2) The prior invention 2 (Evidence No. 6) published on the Korean Intellectual Property Office website on May 12, 2006, the main contents are as stated in attached Form 2(2).
3) The prior invention 3 (Evidence 1) registered on December 1, 200, is an invention related to the "safety valve for air pressure pressure" as stated in Article 20-0213461 of the Korean Utility Model Gazette registered on December 1, 200, and its main contents are as specified in attached Table 2(3). (C) The Defendant against the Plaintiff on January 15, 2014, and the Defendant against the Intellectual Property Tribunal. The prior invention 1 in the instant trial decision on June 3, 192 is an invention related to the "sshdown of valves" published in the Japan Patent Gazette No. 4-160273, published on June 3, 1992, and is different from the literature published in the Japan Patent Gazette No. 3122123, the prior invention 1 in the instant lawsuit.
However, the Japanese Patent Gazette, in which the preceding invention 1 was published in the decision of this case, is the preceding invention 1 in the lawsuit of this case.