logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2016.06.02 2016고정83
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who engages in food manufacturing and processing business and communications sales business under the trade name of "C" in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group B.

No person shall place any indication or advertisement that may deceive, mislead, or confuse consumers with respect to the name, manufacturing method, quality, and nutrition of foods or food additives, raw materials, ingredients, and uses thereof.

Nevertheless, from June 1, 2015 to October 22, 2015, the Defendant advertised 100% of 100% of 10% of 100% of 10% of 201, which does not use sapex, coloring, etc. in the Internet Yapex Internet advertisement, and made the above advertisement as if it was not used as part of the synthetic preservation fee, which is the food additives that cannot be originally used, and as if it was not used, it led to the misunderstanding that the products of other companies are indirectly perceived differently by emphasizing the unused ingredients.

As such, the Defendant advertised the Internet during the above-mentioned period and sold the total amount of KRW 21,796,381.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report-Attachment to Internet advertisements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to data on sales in general, market sales, and sales in general;

1. Article 95 subparagraph 1 of the Food Sanitation Act and Article 13 (1) 3 of the same Act, the selection of fines, including the relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow