The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment, and four hundred and twenty thousand won of collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below has favorable circumstances such as the confession of all the crimes in this case, the depth and deterioration of health due to depression, etc. of the defendant's child, the defendant's child has no record of being punished for the same crime for a period of eight years since he was punished for the same crime in 2005, and the defendant clearly expresses his intention to terminate, but the defendant has a record of being punished three times (two times a suspended sentence of imprisonment and one time a prison term) for the same crime. The scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court for the crime in this case [basic crime: 2 types (b) such as the sale and brokerage, etc. of narcotics crime group), 3 types (b) such as medication, simple possession, etc. of narcotics group, 1 to three years [2 years (2 years)] of imprisonment with prison labor for each basic area, 201 to 2 years [2 years (2/2 years] of imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant, considering the above favorable circumstances of the defendant, it cannot be seen that the court below's sentencing is unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.