logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.10.31 2013노1253
재물손괴등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is as follows: first, under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, the defendant was in a state of mental disability; second, the punishment of the judgment below (two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

First of all, the record reveals that the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of each of the crimes of this case, but the defendant was found to have committed a crime against the police officers dispatched immediately after the crime of June 5, 2013. In the case of the crime of April 28, 2013, G was found to have discovered a head of the head office operated by G for the purpose of demanding medical expenses incurred in the previous injury to the victim G for the purpose of demanding medical expenses incurred in the crime of April 28, 2013. In light of the defendant's speech and behavior before and after each of the crimes of this case, it is recognized that the defendant had weak ability or decision-making ability to discern things under the influence of alcohol at the time of each of the crimes of this case

Next, as to the assertion on unfair sentencing, the defendant had reached about 40 times the criminal power, and among them, the 20 times the age of punishment for interference with business and violence exceeds 20 times, and there are concerns over re-offending by committing each of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the case, even though the of the of the of the of the of the of the of the of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit.

arrow