beta
Text
1. The gift contract of KRW 1,777,766,761 entered into on June 1, 2015 between the Defendant and C is within the scope of KRW 237,706,365.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. C: (a) in the distribution schedule prepared on November 20, 2013, the distribution amount of KRW 3,063,891,720 against the Republic of Korea (the director of the tax office of this thousand) was written against C in the instant distribution schedule of KRW 1,048,04,04,000; (b) KRW 1,659,672,279; and (c) KRW 1,65,279; and (d) KRW 1,50,017,00 against C, the entire creditor of the said claim was written as dividends of KRW 159,65,279; and (d) KRW 2,175,542,836; and (e) KRW 3,65,579,542,836; and (e) KRW 1,579,537,484 of the instant distribution schedule against C; (c) however, (d) the instant claim for objection against the distribution was correcteded by the court.
I also filed a lawsuit of demurrer against the Republic of Korea with the Suwon District Court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court, and the above case was merged with the case E by the plaintiff.
B. On June 26, 2014, C concluded a delegation agreement with the Plaintiff on the instant case concerning the instant case’s objection to the distribution by Seoul High Court F, G (merged), the appellate court, and agreed to pay the Plaintiff KRW 3 million with the retainerion, while in favor of the Plaintiff, it would pay the amount equivalent to 10% of the economic profit he/she gains from the contingent fee.
C. On November 28, 2014, the said appellate court rendered a judgment in full favor of C (hereinafter “the judgment on the objection against distribution in this case”) to the effect that “a correction of the dividend amount to the Republic of Korea against C was made to KRW 159,655,279,000,000 for KRW 2,175,538,414,” and the judgment on the objection against distribution in this case became final and conclusive upon the dismissal of the final appeal by the Republic of Korea on May 28, 2015.
C In accordance with the judgment on the objection to the distribution in this case, 2,015,883,135 won (=2,175,538,414 won - 159,655,279 won) was derived from the economic profit of the Plaintiff in accordance with the judgment on the objection to the distribution in this case. As such, the aforementioned appellate court’s litigation affairs were completed on December 2014, the obligation to pay contingent fees to the Plaintiff (2,015,83,135 won x 0.1).