(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.10.06 2016고단2633

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.10.06 2016고단2633

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 14, 2016, the Defendant driven a high-speed car around 10:10, and driven a high-speed car in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S., a long-distance intersection in the middle-gu, U.S. P., U.S., the Defendant proceeded at a non-speed speed depending on one-lane between the four-lanes from the ductal surface to the ductal surface.

At this point, the vehicle line and traffic signal are installed, and the victim D(54) prior to the Defendant was driving a vehicle in E high-speed E in the same line with the Defendant, so in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to see the front side, maintain the safety distance with the preceding vehicle, and accurately manipulate the steering and brake system to prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, as the Defendant neglected to stop the car driven by the victim due to negligence in front of the week, it was found that the car driven by the victim was stopped and operated rapidly, but the Defendant did not avoid it, and did not take necessary measures such as providing relief to the victim, and did not immediately stop the car, even though the vehicle driven by the victim was damaged to require approximately KRW 424,40,00 for about two weeks of medical treatment by collision with the victim’s vehicle behind the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents and reports on traffic accidents;

1. Each photograph;

1. Registers of driver's licenses, chassiss, mandatory insurance, and verification personnel who have purchased insurance;

1. On the part of the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant understood that immediately after the accident, the victim was involved in dealing with the accident and the victim was able to do so by taking the victim away from the scene, and asserts that the victim did not have any injury to the extent that it is necessary to provide relief for the accident.

According to the above evidence, an accident is assessed.

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2016.10.6.선고 2016고단2633 판결

-울산지방법원 2015.10.28 2015고단1583

-인천지방법원 2020.04.22 2019고단6828

-울산지방법원 2017.4.13.선고 2016노1752 판결

-울산지방법원 2013.04.26 2012고단982