All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of the lower court against the Defendants (10 months of imprisonment; 8 months of suspended sentence; 2 years of suspended sentence; 120 hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendants were committed against the Defendants in the confession of the crime; (b) the Defendants did not have any criminal record of the same kind as the instant crime; and (c) Defendant A committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period due to the previous conviction in the judgment of the court below; (d) the purpose of legislation of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act, which intends to protect consumers and protect public health and the environment from harmful exhaust gases, etc. generated from pseudo petroleum products by securing the distribution order of petroleum products; and (e) systematically leased a large oil storage tank, which aims to systematically protect 120,000 liters; and (e) manufactured fake transit of a large quantity of 120,00 liter; and (e) the process, method, and result, etc. of the instant crime; (e) there is a need to strictly punish the Defendants when selling pseudo petroleum products; and (e) the Defendant A was an employee under the direction of the Defendant A to rent the oil storage tank with his own funds; and other circumstances on sentencing.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.