The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant driven the CK5 vehicle owned by Amamank-kink-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kon-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-k

2. The defendant's defense counsel asserts that on the day of the case, the defendant was not driving the above vehicle since he had the defendant drink while drinking alcohol at the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the day of the case, but had a substitute engineer go through his workplace.

3. The fact that the defendant was divingd in the vehicle while under the influence of 0.261% of blood alcohol level around September 17, 2012 is also acknowledged by the defendant. However, there is no direct evidence to acknowledge the fact that the defendant driven CK5 vehicle in the vehicle under the influence of alcohol level on September 17, 2012. However, at the time the defendant first discovered the foregoing vehicle under the influence of alcohol, there is no direct evidence to acknowledge the fact that the defendant driven CK5 vehicle in the vehicle under the influence of alcohol level. ① On-site photograph (13 pages) at the time when the defendant first discovered the vehicle under the influence of E, ② A control manual prepared by F called F called upon the report of E, ③ The statement at the court of F, and ③ the statement at the jurisdiction of F called CK5 vehicle in the vicinity of the bar 800 meters away from the place where the defendant was found.

On September 17, 2012, the photograph taken by E is that the CK5 car stopped at the center of the two-lanes of the two-lane 16-21 road of the Seodaemun-gu in lieu of Seodaemun-gu, and that the Defendant was locked from the driver’s seat of the above vehicle, and ② the contents of the control manual prepared by F and the statement in the court have been set up on the road and set up on the road, and there is a person locked.