A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Jeju District Court on April 16, 2015 and the same year

9.9. The execution of the sentence was completed in Jeju Prison.

[2] On July 7, 2017, at around 04:51, the Defendant: (a) cut off the victim E in front of D Mart located in Busan Franspo Zone C with a string door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, the victim’s ownership, and then cut off with a 800,000,000 won of 80,000,000 won of 80,000,000 won of 7,000,000 won of 7,000,000 won of 7,000,000 won of 7,000,000 won of Y electronic tobacco.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A report on internal investigation (verification of CCTV around the scene, etc.);

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to confirm crimes during the period of inquiry about criminal history, and repeated offense;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of recommended punishment] [the scope of recommended punishment] for general property, and the mitigated area (4 months to 10 months) (special mitigation [person] for special mitigation] for the same kind of repeated crime which does not fall under the aggravated punishment for a specific crime;

2. Determination of sentence - Determination of sentence - Determination of a repeated crime of the same kind, the fact that the person has been punished four times for the same crime is less stolen under unfavorable circumstances, and the fact that the person has agreed with the victim, etc. shall be considered as favorable circumstances.