1. The plaintiffs' primary and conjunctive claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

가. 당사자들의 지위 (1) 원고들은 피고들과의 사이에, 아산시 A 아파트(이하 ‘이 사건 아파트’라 한다)에 관하여 분양계약(이하 ‘이 사건 분양계약’이라 한다)을 체결한 수분양자들이고, 피고 주식회사 씨엑스디(이하 ‘씨엑스디’라 한다)는 아산신도시 B지구 4, 6블록 개발사업의 건설 및 시행업 등을 주된 목적으로 설립된 법인으로 이 사건 아파트 4블럭 230세대, 6블럭 567세대, 합계 797세대의 분양사업을 시행한 시행사이자 분양자이고, 피고 엑스티엑스건설 주식회사(이하 ‘엑스티엑스건설’이라 한다)는 토목건축공사업, 주택건설사업 등을 주된 목적으로 설립된 법인으로 이 사건 아파트의 시공사이자 분양자이다.

(2) The Plaintiffs entered into the instant sales contract with the Defendants, such as the entry in the column, with respect to the instant apartment as indicated in the separate sheet No. 2, and paid the Defendants the sale price as indicated in the column of the initial sale price for the same list.

B. On September 11, 2008, the Defendants made a public announcement of the sale of the instant apartment on the instant apartment on September 11, 2008, and the subscription was terminated at the subscription rate of 1,058, 1.33: 1 of the subscribers with respect to the total of 797 households in the subscription procedure that took place from the 16th to the 19th day of the same month.

(2) From September 30, 2008 to October 2, 201 of the same year, the Defendants concluded a sales contract with the first or third subscribers who subscribed to the instant apartment from September 30, 2008, and among the Plaintiffs, Plaintiff C and 63 of the “general sale” stated in the “sale method column” listed in the attached Table 3 list among the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “the first bidders”) entered into the sales contract by adding the participation in the initial subscription procedure of the instant apartment, but a large number of the subscribers renounced the conclusion of the sales contract.

(3) The Defendants were unable to sell the goods within the order of priority, and as from October 3, 2008, the same is applicable.