logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.05.21 2019누62002
부당해고구제재심판정취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial are the same as that alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance trial, and even if all the evidence presented in the first instance trial are examined, the plaintiff did not prove any additional evidence in the trial. The fact-finding and decision of the first instance court that rejected the plaintiff's assertion are justifiable). 2. Accordingly, the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the plaintiff's argument is legitimate, and the plaintiff's

arrow