beta
Text
1. The plaintiff
A. The Defendants jointly share KRW 486,273,81, and as to this, from December 17, 2015 to October 5, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendants’ status as the Defendants are married couple, and Defendant B operated the “E Medical Center” which was entrusted by the D Hospital affiliated with the Plaintiff, and Defendant C served as the president of the Plaintiff.
B. The Defendants’ embezzlement and the Defendants were convicted of the crime of occupational embezzlement, etc. on November 2, 2015, on the following grounds: (a) the Daejeon District Court’s Decision 2014Kadan524, 2015Kadan1005 (Joint) was indicted; and (b) the Defendants were convicted of the crime of occupational embezzlement, etc.
Of the above judgments, the part against Defendant C was finalized, and the part against Defendant B continued to be by the Daejeon District Court 2015No3635 with the appeal of Defendant B and the prosecutor, and the above court rendered a conviction for all the following crimes except for those acknowledged to have reduced from KRW 206,68,819 to KRW 198,380,311, from KRW 206,68,819 to KRW 198,380,311. The above judgment became final and conclusive.
1) The Defendants jointly committed a crime by using personal credit cards, such as Defendant C and F, to pay for the goods of the Plaintiff’s customer, and then to preserve the money in excess of the amount of the amount of the payment, or to lend the preserved money to the Plaintiff again to the Plaintiff by means of collecting the Plaintiff’s funds from the account of Defendant C and F, and embezzled the money by using the money in mind. From May 10, 2010 to August 31, 2012, the Defendants transferred KRW 206,688,819, total sum over 257 times from May 10, 2010 to August 31, 2012.
B) On February 28, 2012, the Defendants: (a) borrowed KRW 287,893,500 from the OO2 Savings Bank for the purchase of the Plaintiff’s cancer checkup vehicle and the installation of medical equipment in the checkup vehicle; and (b) embezzled by using the method of private use while working for the Plaintiff; (b) Defendant B’s sole crime committed by Defendant B, even though the public health doctor G belonging to the D Hospital did not actually work for the said hospital from June 201 to November 201, Defendant B did not actually work for the said hospital, the Defendants’ account from June 16, 2010 to the G account.