The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On November 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) entered into a sex relationship between B and B, and (b) was pregnant; and (c) around May 2013, the Defendant thought that B was born a fetus due to the opposition, etc. by the parents.

B, around May 29, 2012, hospitalized with the “D” woman located in Pakistan, and discharged the 17th pregnant fetus out of her body by means of leading delivery that opens a womb and puts the promotional agents into the body at around 11:00 of the same month on May 29, 2012.

The Defendant, as above, assisted the act of abortion B by facilitating the crime by signing on a written consent for surgery, a written application for hospitalization, and an application for the use of the higher rank hospital necessary for abortion operation in order to assist the abortion in performing abortion as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police and prosecutorial statement concerning B, and the chief of the complaint;

1. Investigation report (the details of remittance by the accused to the complainant), investigation report (as a result of the written appraisal, page 121 of the investigation records), investigation report (Attachment of the judgment in the case of B abortion), application of Acts and subordinate statutes on personal financial transactions;

1. Relevant Article 269 (1) and Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 32(2) and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act for aiding and abetting and mitigation;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Suspension of Sentence provides that there is no particular criminal history as well as a minor fine; Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., that the accused has been subject to the suspension of sentence B, which is the principal offender; and that the accused

1. As the judgment of the sentence of confiscation Nos. 1 through 4 does not constitute confiscation under Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act, it does not constitute a separate determination of confiscation.