beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On February 3, 2008, the Defendant: (a) within the Fda area operated by the victim E on March 3, 2008, the Defendant: (b) provided that “The president of the Dong-dong G Gg (G) shall send money to the victim; and (c) provided that “The Defendant shall repay money if he/she lends money to the victim because he/she needs to do so to have his/her sexual intercourse with the Gu-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong,
However, the defendant and the above G did not have any relationship with the above-mentioned golf course business, and the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money without any specific property.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 200,000 won immediately from the victim on February 3, 2008, and acquired 6,50,000 won in total over 10 times from February 3, 2008 to August 1, 2008, as shown in the attached list of crimes, as shown above, as well as from February 3, 2008 to receive 20,000 won.
2. At around 15:00 on February 26, 2008, the Defendant stated that “FC” operated by the victim E in Samgnam-si, the Defendant would be entitled to receive the right to receive the project of cutting down trees on the site of the golf course cultivation from the victim. In addition, the Defendant followed the large forest industry in which the right to engage in cutting down trees in the second financial right construction project implemented by the ASEAN-si, and deposited the construction cost of KRW 50 million by February 8, 2008. If the Defendant loans the land as collateral, it would be repaid again within a week.”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any relation with the right to engage in the business of cutting down pine trees on the golf course site in Gannam Development. There was no fact that the ASEAN Cooperatives had carried out the new business of the second financial right training institute. The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to complete payment even if he borrowed money without any specific property.
On February 26, 2008, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim, provided the land located at H as collateral to the bond company in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do; and (b) borrowed KRW 40 million from the victim.