logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.30 2018고정432
상해
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On December 08, 2017, the Defendant: (a) made a dispute between E and E, which calls for the Defendant to leave without having taken over his/her duties in the office of the management office of the D apartment in Yongsan-si; (b) made a price on the face of E in drinking; and (c) caused damage to the floor beyond the floor, etc., the Defendant was on the old net, electric booms, and booms that require treatment for a period of 14 days.

2. The portion not guilty (the point of injury);

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) the date and time indicated in the facts charged; (b) the Defendant pushed the victim at a place where it was charged; (c) the Defendant taken the shoulder and part of the victim’s shouldered; and (d) the victim’s face was taken to drink the victim’s face; and (c) the victim exceeded the victim’s awareness; and (d) the victim’s left side must be cut off, and (e) the victim took a click on the victim’s face at a 1stm radius; and (e) the victim visited the hospital on the day of the instant case and was issued with a diagnosis letter of injury “the victim was issued to the victim,” which requires two-time medical treatment.

B. However, in full view of all the following circumstances revealed by the records and evidence submitted by the prosecutor, it is difficult to readily conclude that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone constitutes an injury under the Criminal Act to the extent that the health condition is infringed beyond the naturally cured degree of injury, such as an injury related to the act of the Defendant’s assault, or an injury, such as an injection, is beyond the scope of natural recovery.

① On December 9, 2017, the date following the occurrence of the instant case, the victim was in the police’s inquiry that held the father as the instant case, and was in the influence of a musta, etc. to approximately 1 cent, and there is no special action for the soba.

In addition to the statement, the statement on the content of other damage was not made at all.

2. The above written diagnosis of injury.

arrow