1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. In the course of the dispute between Won and the Defendants (1) the Plaintiff is the owner of Ji Government-si B lending 201, and the Defendant Jeong Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Jeong Industrial”) ordered the construction of underground reports within the housing site development construction area of the zone C from the Government-Si around November 4, 1996 to April 19, 197, upon receiving an order for the construction of underground reports within the housing site development construction area of the zone C zone from the Government-Si around 1996.

(2) Around November 1996, the owners of the Plaintiff and B lending (hereinafter “Plaintiffs, etc.”) filed a petition with the Government-Si of the Defendant, for the expansion of rupture on B lending due to the instant rupture destruction work of the Defendant Uia Industry, and for the implementation of safety measures.

(3) On November 20, 1996, the Government-Si ordered the head of the C District Supervision Group, who is an employee of D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), to report the degree of damage and safety measures, etc. according to the said petition, E reported to the Government-Si on November 23, 1996 on the installation of measuring instruments and other relevant matters.

(4) On November 29, 1996, the plaintiff et al. agreed that the plaintiff et al. would have agreed that the plaintiff et al. would have reached mutual agreement on whether to repair or compensate if there is an error by re-measurementing the ruptures, fluores, fluores, etc. on the inside wall surface of the defendant Pari Industries by December 10, 1996.

(5) On June 11, 1997, Defendant Pasi Industry paid an agreed amount to each household owner of BJ loan except the Plaintiff, and completed the rooftop waterproof construction work.

B. (1) A final and conclusive judgment (1) around 2000, the Plaintiff filed a false report by D’s staff E, who was ordered to take measures against Defendant’s Government B lending C based on the Plaintiff’s petition, etc., to the Defendant’s Government Government. The Defendant’s Government City ordered the instant construction work for the destruction of the ground, and installed a facility for soil shield under the Construction Technology Management Act for safety purposes.