A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, who interfered with business, was aware of the victim as a guest of the Daejeon Pungsung-gu, Daejeon, which was operated by the victim B (the age of 58), with the victim, and became aware of his/her sexual intercourse with the victim on January 1, 2019.

The victim B did not refuse the request of the remaining defendant by allowing the defendant to inform the victims of the sex relationship with the defendant, and living together for about two months since that time.

The Hague came into existence.

On May 16, 2019, the Defendant, at around 23:00, obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about one hour and 30 minutes by under the influence of the victim’s restaurant business by under the influence of the victim’s “D”, i.e., under the influence of alcohol on the ground that the Defendant does not meet the Defendant, and by drinking the Defendant, “Isknish, Isnish, Isnish, Isnish, Isnish, and let the Defendant go out of the restaurant.”

2. On May 17, 2019, at around 01:00 on May 17, 2019, the Defendant, in front of the victim B’s house, left in front of the victim B, as described in paragraph (1) and in the circumstances described in paragraph (1), leaving the victim’s house with the wind to drive away the victim B, leaving the door door, leaving the door door, leaving the door door several times, and leaving the door door several times, and having received a request from the victim to return back to the scene, the Defendant, upon receiving the report, was called the police officer who called up until the police officer arrives at the site and was sitting up in front of the above front door, and

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and videos taken on the face of arrest in response to eviction;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), Article 319(2) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes with the punishment heavier than that prescribed by the crime of interference with business);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession, agreement, etc.);