The defendant paid KRW 20,00,000 to the plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 27, 2020 to September 24, 2020.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 23, 2004, the Plaintiff is a legally married couple who reported marriage with C on April 23, 2004, and has two children between C and C.

B. The Defendant committed an unlawful act by leaving C, who is a workplace partner, as the annual relation from the end of 2018.

【Ground of recognition】 The facts without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's evidence 1 through 16 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. (1) A third party’s liability for damages shall not interfere with a married couple’s communal living falling under the essence of marriage by interfering with a married couple’s communal living by causing a failure of the married couple’s communal living, etc. A third party’s unlawful act with either side of the married couple, thereby hindering a married couple’s communal living falling under the essence of marriage. A third party’s act of infringing on or interfering with a married couple’s communal living falling under the essence of marriage by committing an unlawful act with the married couple, and infringing on the right as the spouse’s right, thereby causing emotional distress to the spouse

(2) According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant committed an unlawful act with the knowledge that C is a spouse, thereby infringing upon the Plaintiff’s spouse’s right as his/her spouse by interfering with it, and it is apparent in light of the empirical rule that the Plaintiff suffered emotional distress due to the Defendant’s unlawful act, and thus, the Defendant is obliged to compensate for the Plaintiff’s emotional distress.

B. Furthermore, considering all the circumstances revealed in the argument of the instant case, including the scope of liability for damages and the period of marital life of the Plaintiff and C, family relationship, Plaintiff’s health status, and the period during which the Defendant continued to commit unlawful act, it is reasonable to determine the amount of consolation money as KRW 20,00,000.

(c)a decision;