The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable (the completion of a sexual assault treatment program for 6 months and 40 hours).

2. The lower court’s sentencing is appropriate in light of various circumstances known by the record, and it abused its discretion or deviates from its discretionary power.

There is no circumstance to consider.

There is no change in circumstances that the court below could change the punishment set against the defendant for the first time in the first instance.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.