beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of one year and six months and fine of 2,600,000,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment of one year and six months and fine of 1,600,000.
Reasons
On September 8, 2011, Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at Seoul Eastern District Court on September 8, 201, and completed the execution of the above sentence on October 31, 201.
Criminal facts
1. Defendant A: (a) was a person who operates a scrap metal company with the trade name “H” from Hanam-si, and (b) was willing to receive KRW 50 million in the course of the business from I in return for issuing a false sales tax invoice in the name of H (hereinafter “H”) and H (hereinafter “H”) with the actual operation of Ha, and one hundred million in the course of the business after the completion of the business.
Around January 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) filed a return on the confirmation of value-added tax on Echeon-si, Echeon-si, Echeon-si; (b) submitted a list of total tax invoices by 22,286,238,590, stating that G issued a total of 164 supply values to H; and (c) submitted a list of total tax invoices by 22,286,238,590, stating that G issued a total of 164 supply values to H; and (d) filed a return on the confirmation of value-added tax on Echeon-si, 2013 through I on July 25, 2013, G submitted a list of total tax invoices by 3,173,163,010, stating that G issued a total of 26 supply values to H.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with I, submitted to the Government a list of total tax invoices by false seller which constitutes 25,459,401,600.
2. Defendant B: (a) was a person who operates a scrap metal company with the trade name of K in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si; (b) was urged to receive KRW 300,000 per month among the businesses in return for issuing false sales tax invoices in the name of G in return for the I and H, who actually operated H, and one hundred million won after the completion of the business.
Although the Defendant did not supply K with goods or services to H, on January 25, 2013, the Defendant confirmed the value-added tax at 2012 at Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, an Ansan-si, through I.